Matter of Wagner v. Czerwinski

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• deferring to dis- trict court’s credibility determinations as to whether the offic- ers prolonged a stop
• affirming district court’s factual finding that unrelated inquiry did not measurably prolong stop at all, but noting that constitutionality of stop would be in question if suspicionless checks prolonged stop
• deferring to district court’s credibility determinations as to whether the officers prolonged a stop
• “If an officer reasonably thinks he sees a driver commit a traffic infraction, that is a sufficient basis to pull him over without violating the Constitution.”
• “If an officer reasonably thinks he sees a driver commit a traffic infraction, that is a sufficient basis to pull him over without violating the Constitution.”
• “If an officer reasonably thinks he sees a driver commit a traffic infraction, that is a sufficient basis to pull him over without violating the Constitution.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).