· 6/13/1978
Matter of Urban Renewal [Patchen Post]
Citations
- 45 N.Y.2d 1
- 379 N.E.2d 169
- 407 N.Y.S.2d 641
- 1978 N.Y. LEXIS 2065
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that in a taking, an owner is ordinarily compensated for the amount that “it can reasonably be anticipated a prudent buyer would be willing to pay in an open market”
- compensation for government taking of “specialty” property, which might be worth to its owner “everything it cost to construct and more” yet lacks a buyer “willing to purchase it even at its reproduction value”
- compensation for government taking of 2 “specialty” property, which might be worth to its owner “everything it cost to 3 construct and more” yet lacks a buyer “willing to purchase it even at its 4 reproduction value”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Fuchsberg
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.