Skip to main content
· 4/5/1996

Matter of Up North Plastics, Inc.

Citations

  • 940 F. Supp. 229
  • 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14639
  • 1996 WL 556883

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding an unsupported, “speculative” fear that releasing a search warrant affidavit might expose cooperating witnesses to harassment or intimidation insufficient to merit “the ex- traordinary measure of sealing the court’s records”
  • “[A] person whose property has been seized pursuant to a search warrant has a right under the Fourth Amendment to inspect and copy the affidavit upon which the warrant was issued.”
  • “Where the government asserts a need to seal the information from the eyes of the person whose property was searched, it must make a specific showing of compelling need and must establish that there is no less restrictive alternative to sealing the records.”
  • setting precedent upon which Up North Plastics court relied

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Noel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.