Matter of Trina L. v. Michelene M.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that it is generally not appropriate to provide injunctive or declaratory relief from a superseded law
• finding a challenge to a Postal Service regulation moot where the agency had “beat [the appellants] to the punch by amending the regulation to exempt” the challenged activity
• finding a challenge to a Postal Service regulation moot where the agency had “beat [the appellants] to the punch by amending the regulation to exempt” the challenged activity
• upholding a ban on collecting signatures on postal sidewalks because Postal Service customers and employees “have complained [that doing so] blocks the flow of traffic into and out of the post office building”
• finding it “implausible that the Postal Service would have gone through the cumbersome process of amending its regulation . . . only to re-amend the regulation after this case is resolved”
• A speech restriction in a nonpublic forum is permissible if \reasonable and not an effort to suppress expression merely because public officials oppose the speaker's view.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).