Matter of Triggs v. Capra

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[t]o satisfy the second prong, a plaintiff responding to an anti-SLAPP motion must state and substantiate a legally sufficient claim”
• concluding that review of a State Bar grievance “could reasonably be construed as statements made in connection with official proceedings”
• recognizing that questions of conditional privilege are generally reserved for a jury
• allegations of theft 1 Alternatively, to the extent that Kidd raised the issue below of dismissal pursuant to OCGA § 9-11-12(b)(6), we agree that Porter has failed to state any claims for which relief can be granted for the reasons stated in Division 2(a)-(d

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).