Matter of Tricia A.C. v. Saul H.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding a showing the defendant’s own constitutional rights have been violated eliminates any further need to make an independent showing of standing
• reasoning that no seizure occurred in part because “[t]here were no ‘commands’ ” and “only requests for information”
• reasoning that no seizure occurred in part because “[t]here were no ‘commands’ ” and “only requests for information”
• noting that a “commanding” tone of voice is evidence of seizure
• stating consent may be express or implied and is determined by a consideration of the totality of the circumstances
• noting the duration of the questioning as a factor in determining the voluntariness of consent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).