Skip to main content
· 12/29/1977

Matter of the Appl. for the Dis., Frisbee

Citations

  • 262 N.W.2d 162

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding district court abused its discretion in refusing to hear and weigh evidence to determine whether a party may reopen its evidentiary presentation
  • listing long line of cases recognizing that a trial court has the discretionaiy option to reopen a party’s case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sheran

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.