Matter of Terelle v. New York City Dept. of Educ.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that trial court erred in allowing remote testimony by two essential witnesses who were unwilling to travel from Australia
• holding that although “presenting the fact-finder with crucial evidence” is an “important public policy,” it did not outweigh defendant’s right to face-to-face confrontation
• holding that the use of two-way video conferencing violates the confrontation clause
• holding that because the right to confront is compromised when confrontation occurs through an electronic medium, a trial court must fully apply the Craig analysis when permitting virtual testimony at trial
• stating that Craig remains the proper test for the admissibility of live two-way video testimony under the Confrontation Clause and declining to apply Crawford
• holding in conspiracy and fraud case that tlCraig supplies the proper test for admissibility of two-way video conference testimony”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).