Matter of Stanley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• during several days of trial before the court, respondent used unacceptable language, made constant interruptions, was extremely arrogant, and made several retorts to rulings; he was publicly reprimanded
• laughing and facial grimaces directed at judge part of contemptuous conduct
• undignified and discourteous conduct degrading to the tribunal and prejudicial to the administration of justice warranted public reprimand
• undignified and discourteous conduct degrading to the tribunal and prejudicial to the administration of justice warranted public reprimand
• respondent was retired from the practice of law, had no prior ethical infractions and had not caused harm to his client; therefore, he was publicly reprimanded
• public reprimand for engaging in undignified and discourteous conduct at judicial hearing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).