Matter of Srulowitz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reviewing the standard set forth in Kleindienst v. Mandel , 408 U.S. 753 , 92 S.Ct. 2576 , 33 L.Ed.2d 683 (1972)\through the lens of Justice Kennedy's [concurring] opinion in\ Kerry v. Din , --- U.S. ----, 135 S.Ct. 2128 , 192 L.Ed.2d 183 (2015
• “[T]he Government chose not to make the review publicly available” even in redacted form
• \[I]rreparable harm occurs when the threatened injury impairs the court's ability to grant an effective remedy.\
• \The President's own words-publicly stating a constitutionally impermissible reason for the Proclamation-distinguish this case from those in which courts have found that the Government had satisfied Mandel 's 'bona fide' prong.\
• “[T]he same injury can provide Plaintiffs with standing for multiple claims.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).