MATTER OF SPENCER v. Spencer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding New York could not modify expired order from Connecticut because Connecticut maintained exclusive jurisdiction due to father’s continued residence there
• “Because the father still resides in Connecticut, that state has continuing, exclusive jurisdiction of the child support order [under the UIFSA] and New York does not have subject matter jurisdiction to modify that order.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).