Matter of Smith v. Annucci

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that although review of a certiorari action is for correction of errors at law, the evidence relevant to an allegation of aviolation of a constitutional right is reviewed de novo
• reserving question of whether participation in sex offender treatment program requiring offender to admit past crimes violated due process under the state constitution
• reserving question of whether participation in sex offender treatment program requiring offender to admit past crimes violated due process under the state constitution
• noting consequences such as loss of custody and loss of eligibility for earned-time credits do not result in Fifth Amendment violations
• reserving question of whether participation in sex offender treatment program requiring offender to admit past crimes violated due process under the state constitution
• confining analysis to the United States Constitution where applicant did not cite state constitution, district court issued a ruling only addressing United States Constitution, and applicant failed to file a motion to enlarge the findings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).