Matter of Sinopidis v. Port Auth. of N.Y. & N.J.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting an as-applied vagueness challenge to a regulation prohibiting “disorderly conduct” or other conduct on federal property that “impedes or disrupts the performance of official duties by Government employees”
• noting the court’s review of a vagueness challenge not based on the First Amendment was “limited to whether [the plaintiff] had fair notice that the [criminal] regulations proscribed her conduct”
• rejecting the plaintiff’s “attempts to take [a void-for-vagueness challenge] beyond the facts of her own case” because her challenge was not based on the First Amendment and a facial challenge was thus not appropriate
• “This Court construes a regulation using the same rules applicable to 9 USCA4 Appeal: 22-1954 Doc: 53 Filed: 02/16/2024 Pg: 10 of 15 statutory construction.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).