Matter of Simpson v. Annucci

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Conversely, when the design of a useful article is ‘as much the result of utilitarian pressures as aesthetic choices,’ the useful and aesthetic elements are not conceptually separable.”
• “Certainly one approach to determine whether material can be ‘identified separately,’ and the most obvious, is to rely on the capacity of the artistic material to be severed physically from the industrial design.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).