Matter of Schaller

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a benefit was too speculative to provide a basis for relief classified as a conclusion of law
• 17% to 18% cushion held not to offer adequate protection where cushion was being rapidly eroded by the daily accrual of interest on the debt

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).