Matter of Salazar v. Metropolitan Transp. Auth.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Sixth 'Amendment was violated by admissions made to state psychiatrist because the court ordered the sessions to determine competency
• holding that psychiatrist's evaluation of a defendant's 'future dangerousness' implicates the Fifth and Sixth Amendments
• holding that the death penalty was improperly imposed where the psychiatric examination on which the expert testified at the penalty phase proceeded in violation of the right to counsel
• holding that defendant’s privilege against self-incrimination was violated when he was not advised of Miranda rights during court-ordered examination
• holding that the death penalty is \improperly imposed\ if evidence obtained in violation of the defendant's Sixth Amendment rights is submitted during the penalty phases of his capital trial
• holding that the death penalty is “improperly imposed” if evidence obtained in violation of the defendant’s Sixth Amendment rights is submitted during the penalty phases of his capital trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).