District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 7/29/1987
Matter of Sablowsky
Citations
- 529 A.2d 289
- 1987 D.C. App. LEXIS 396
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- respondent violated DR 1-102(A)(5) by attempting to sell information to other attorneys to be used as factual evidence in a case in which respondent was not otherwise involved
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Nebeker, Ferren, Rogers
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.