Matter of Ryanna H. (Monique H.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he claim term ‘a microprocessor’ does not require there be only one microprocessor . . . .”
• “We have explained that the indefi- nite article ‘a’ means ‘one or more.’”
• “We have explained that the indefi- nite article ‘a’ means ‘one or more.’”
• “[I]t does not suffice to have multiple microprocessors, each able to perform just one of the recited functions; the claim language requires at least one microprocessor capable of performing each of the recited functions.”
• “For a dog owner to have ‘a dog that rolls over and fetches sticks,’ it does not suffice that he have two dogs, each able to perform just one of the tasks.” (quoting /n re Varma, 816 F.3d 1352, 1363 (Fed. Cir. 2016))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).