Matter of Rowlands v. Baker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the INA does not supersede the APA's right to judicial review because there is no language in the INA which “expressly supersedes or modifies” § 10 of the APA
• noting that .party status is determined by “practical considerations”
• allowing for judicial review of a deporta- tion order under the APA
• allowing for judicial review of a deportation order under the APA
• interpret- ing 1952 Immigration and Nationality Act, 66 Stat. 163, to provide for review of deportation orders
• “Our former cases have established a policy under which indispensability of parties is determined on practical considerations.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).