Matter of Richards v. Allied Universal Sec.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• upholding dispensing convictions where evidence showed prescription written in violation of § 19
• although “evidence contradicted, and tended to undermine ... the Commonwealth’s case,” it did not demonstrate that Commonwealth’s evidence was “conclusively incorrect”
• psychiatrist indicted and convicted under G. L. c. 94C, § 19, as well as drug statutes
• deterioration occurs when Commonwealth’s evidence shown to be incredible or conclusively incorrect
• deterioration occurs when Commonwealth’s evidence shown to be incredible or conclusively incorrect
• ‘Testimony about [drug diversion] operations ... is helpful to the fact finders and is admissible [because] it is more akin to a description of the modus operandi of [drug diverters] than a ‘profile’ of a drug dealer”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).