Matter of Rawson v. DiNapoli

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• making same observation and noting that “[s]uch a possibility doesn’t always exist”
• “If a ground is omitted from a pre-verdict motion…the ground cannot be asserted in a post-verdict motion or in an appeal.”
• “If a ground is omitted from a pre-verdict motion, however, the ground cannot be asserted in a post-verdict motion . . . .”
• “We . . . must reverse based on an erroneous instruction if there is even a slight possibility of an effect on the verdict.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).