Matter of Provost v. Provost

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• describing “spoofing” applications on a defendant’s phone that “enabled him to place outgoing phone calls under the guise of a different phone number”
• \Sentencing courts need not recount every detail of their decisional processes; identification of the 'main factors behind [the] decision' is enough.\ (alteration in original) (quoting United States v. Vargas-García, 794 F.3d 162, 166 (1st Cir. 2015))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).