Matter of Pedicini v. Hull

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the heavy burden imposed on the State “effectively eliminated any such risk” that the immunized testimony would be used against the witness in the event of a prosecution
• rejecting a per se rule that would have held use/derivative use immunity inadequate under Fifth Amendment where grand jury witness was also a defendant awaiting trial
• witness may be compelled to testify before grand jury about certain transaction despite pending criminal charges involving same transaction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).