Matter of Parental Rights as to DRH

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the presumption of token efforts was not rebutted where the parents had failed to adequately address their drug and anger management problems despite being provided extensive services
• stating that parental termination proceedings involve a parent’s fundamental right to raise his or her child
• stating that presumption created by NRS 128.109(2) is rebuttable and that “[p]arents are free to present evidence showing that termination of their parental rights is not in a child’s best interest”
• upholding a statute authorizing termination of parental rights by applying strict scrutiny in a substantive due process challenge

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).