Matter of Oxford Developers, LLC v. Jefferson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• evidence that witness exercises his Fifth Amendment right “produce[s] no relevant evidence, while inviting the jury to engage in unwarranted and impermissible speculation”
• evidence that witness exercises his Fifth Amendment right “producéis] no relevant evidence, while inviting the jury to engage in unwarranted and impermissible speculation”
• evidence that witness exercises his Fifth Amendment right “pro-ducéis] no relevant evidence, while inviting the jury to engage in unwarranted and impermissible speculation”
• “where the identity of the killer is the only live issue at trial, any error in the malice instruction is not prejudicial because the defendant’s state of mind is not in dispute. The issue is the identity of the perpetrator”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).