Skip to main content
· 12/3/1992

Matter of Oceanic Fleet, Inc.

Citations

  • 807 F. Supp. 1261
  • 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18309
  • 1992 WL 366159

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Plaintiff would not be excused from being on notice if it believed it had some other compelling defense to the claim, such as no negligence on its part.” (citations omitted)
  • “Courts have concluded that written notice must inform the owner both of ‘details of the incident’ and ‘that the owner appeared to be responsible for the damage in question.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Arceneaux

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.