Matter of Nyla S. (Jason B.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding future profits for a 12 Plaintiffs argue their damages were speculative because there was uncertainty (1) when the FDA would approve the 1% generic and (2
• “[I]f a continuing violation extends into the statute period, the victim is entitled to complain about the whole violation, no matter how long ago it began.”
• “Exclusion from a market is a conventional form of antitrust injury that gives rise to a claim for damages as soon as the exclusion occurs . . . even though, in the nature of things, the victim’s losses lie mostly in the future.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).