Matter of New York State Div. of Human Rights v. Milan Maintenance, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that BIPA claims are preempted by the Railway Labor Act
• noting that “either a substantive or a jurisdictional label ends the litigation between these parties and forecloses its continuation in any other judicial forum”
• noting that \[n]one of this circuit's [RLA] decisions considers the effect of the Supreme Court's modern understanding of the difference between 'jurisdiction' and other kinds of rules\
• recognizing the same basis for removal in the context of the Railway Labor Act
• affirming dismissal without prejudice in favor of collective bargaining agreement process
• BIPA claims preempted because resolving plaintiffs’ claims inevitably required looking to collective bargaining agreement for issue of consent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).