Matter of Minichino v. Fox

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the University of Maryland’s policy barring domiciled aliens and their dependents from acquiring instate tuition violated the supremacy clause
• holding that the University of Maryland’s policy barring domiciled aliens and their dependents from acquiring in-state tuition violated the supremacy clause
• holding that-the University of Maryland’s policy barring domiciled aliens and their- dependents from acquiring instate tuition violated the supremacy clause
• holding that the Supreme Court has \long recognized the preeminent role of the Federal Government with respect to the regulation of aliens within our borders\ and collecting cases to that effect
• holding that the Supreme Court has “long recognized the preeminent role of the Federal Government with respect to the regulation of aliens within our borders” and collecting cases to that effect
• holding that a state policy precluding certain aliens from acquiring in-state status for the purpose of university tuition violated the Supremacy Clause and de- clining to consider equal protection arguments

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).