Matter of Michael S. (Charle S.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that whether a party has the securities to tender back is a question of fact
• \a non-reliance clause does not as a matter of law necessarily preclude reasonable reliance\
• resolving whether reliance was reasonable as a matter of law
• resolving whether reliance was reasonable as a matter oflaw

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).