Matter of McFarlane v. Sapeg

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that disciplinary sanction imposed on prisoner did not bar subsequent criminal prosecution for the same conduct
• holding that a district court could consider the sentence of a codefendant in determining the defendant's specific sentence within the Guideline range
• holding that a district court could consider the sentence of a codefendant in determining the defendant's specific sentence within the Guideline range
• ruling that disciplinary segregation and transfer did not act as bar to prosecution
• holding that a prison disciplinary hearing is not a prosecution for purposes of the double jeopardy clause, and sanctions pursuant to prison regulations did not constitute “punishment” which barred later criminal prosecution
• finding that forfeiture of 1000 days of good time credits and a disciplinary transfer for assaulting a prison guard and using intoxicants was not so disproportionate as to be punitive

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).