Skip to main content
· 12/14/1992

Matter of Marriage of Thier

Citations

  • 841 P.2d 794
  • 67 Wash. App. 940
  • 1992 Wash. App. LEXIS 512

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding “[w]e find no error in the court’s refusal to enforce the terms of any agreement pertaining to custody”
  • the terms of an agreement pertaining to child custody are not binding on the trial court
  • the terms of an agreement pertaining to child custody are not binding on the trial court
  • the best interests of the child \`standard cannot be invoked on behalf of someone other than the child'\ (emphasis omitted)
  • in absence of showing that paternity determination is in child’s best interests, best-interest-of-child standard cannot be invoked on behalf of someone other than child
  • in absence of showing that paternity determination is in child's best interests, best-interest-of-child standard cannot be invoked on behalf of someone other than child

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Coleman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.