Skip to main content
· 1/18/1994

Matter of Marriage of Roth

Citations

  • 865 P.2d 43
  • 72 Wash. App. 566
  • 1994 Wash. App. LEXIS 22

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “In the hopes of discouraging dubious interpretation of questionable decretal language, we hold further that the decree must specifically mention remarriage in order to overcome the presumption”
  • “‘[E]xpress provision’ means use of the word ‘remarriage’. Here, neither the dissolution agreement nor any other agreement provides that maintenance is to continue past remarriage; remarriage therefore terminated the obligation.”
  • “Dicta is language not necessary to the decision in a particular case.”
  • dictum is language not necessary to the decision

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sweeney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.