· 1/18/1994
Matter of Marriage of Roth
Citations
- 865 P.2d 43
- 72 Wash. App. 566
- 1994 Wash. App. LEXIS 22
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “In the hopes of discouraging dubious interpretation of questionable decretal language, we hold further that the decree must specifically mention remarriage in order to overcome the presumption”
- “‘[E]xpress provision’ means use of the word ‘remarriage’. Here, neither the dissolution agreement nor any other agreement provides that maintenance is to continue past remarriage; remarriage therefore terminated the obligation.”
- “Dicta is language not necessary to the decision in a particular case.”
- dictum is language not necessary to the decision
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sweeney
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.