Matter of Marriage of Olson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• refusing to review argument and noting appellant did not argue that an exception in RAP 2.5(a) applied
• prohibiting ex-husband from making disparaging remarks about ex-wife to children did not violate First Amendment
• courts are “under no obligation to grant special favors to . . . a pro se litigant.”
• courts are “under no obligation to grant special favors to . . . a pro se litigant.”
• pro se litigants on appeal are held to the same standards as attorneys and are bound by the same rules of procedure and substantive law
• restrictions on \disparaging remarks\ were not unconstitutional because defamatory remarks are not protected by the First Amendment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).