Matter of Marina C. v. Dario D.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing the court of appeals decision is our final decision on issues we choose not to review
• noting that a court considering an ineffective assistance of counsel claim may rely on ethical rules for lawyers to measure counsel’s performance
• stating that to prevail on a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel a defendant must prove (1) counsel failed to perform an essential duty, and (2
• finding that even though trial counsel should have objected to prosecutor’s misstatement of law with respect to intent to deprive, evidence showed defendant intended to permanently deprive owner of vehicle
• recognizing “cumulative effect of ineffective assistance of counsel claims when analyzing prejudice”
• describing the two-prong test for ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claims set out in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687, 104 S. Ct. 2052, 2064 (1984)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).