Matter of Marcus v. Marcus

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Where Nevada law is lacking, its courts have looked to the law of other 21 jurisdictions, particularly California, for guidance.” (quotation omitted)
• claimant meets a regular care requirement when they make “good faith 14 efforts to seek care in the aftermath of the accident,” but not when they fail to receive “any 15 physician’s care whatsoever during the period in dispute”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).