Matter of Manfredonia v. Scivolette

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[i]n cases where the Commonwealth does not seek a [LWOP] sentence, the application of the Miller factors is not required”
• concluding that because the appellant’s term of 45 years’ to life imprisonment rendered him eligible for parole at the age of 62, it was not a de facto LWOP sentence
• concluding that because the appellant’s term of 45 years’ to life imprisonment rendered him eligible for parole at the age of 62, it was not a de facto LWOP sentence
• concluding that because the appellant's term of 45 years' to life imprisonment rendered him eligible for parole at the age of 62, it was not a de facto LWOP sentence
• concluding that because the appellant's term of 45 years' to life imprisonment rendered him eligible for parole at the age of 62, it was not a de facto LWOP sentence
• concluding that, “because the Commonwealth [] did not seek, and the sentencing court did not impose, a life-without-parole sentence, there was no error by the sentencing court in failing to consider the Miller factors.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).