Matter of Lancaster v. Nicolas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Board “was cor- rect to not allow the extrinsic evidence, including expert testimony, to trump the persuasive intrinsic evidence” (cleaned up)
• explaining that the AIA was designed “to provide an alternative to district court litigation”
• reaching constitutional challenge to the Board raised for the first time on appeal
• reaching constitutional challenge to the Board raised for the first time on appeal
• “[S]ubstantial evidence supports the [PTAB’s] assessment and weighing of this ev- idence, and we decline to reweigh the evidence on appeal.”
• \IPRs use a preponderance of the evidence burden of proof rather than the district court's clear and convincing evidence burden of proof.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).