Matter of Kucker Marino Winiarsky & Bittens, LLC v. Neiman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that counsel's failure to investigate had “pervasive effect” on evidentiary picture at trial and failure to interview witnesses was prejudicial
• en banc; citing § 2254(b); Rose v. Lundy, 455 U.S. 509, 102 S.Ct. 1198, 71 L.Ed.2d 379 (1982)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).