Matter of Kaylee D. (Kimberly D.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “prison video surveillance evidence constitutes documentary evidence subject to the procedural due process protections recognized in Wolff”
• recognizing qualified right to individualized consideration of request for access to surveillance camera footage in disciplinary hearings, where inmate shows it might aid defense
• explaining that in order to show a procedural due process violation, there still must be evidence that the document would have “aided the [inmate’s] defense”
• explaining that the “some evidence” standard of Hill is inapplicable when a court is considering “whether prison officials’ failure to disclose or consider testimonial or documentary [evidence] was harmless”
• explaining that the “some evidence” standard of Hill is inapplicable when a court is considering “whether prison officials’ failure to disclose or consider testimonial or documentary [evidence] was harmless”
• holding the procedural due process right to present documentary evidence is applicable to a prisoner’s request that prison officials produce and review a surveillance video in connection with his or her disciplinary proceedings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).