Matter of Jewish Press Inc. v. New York City Police Dept.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that 24 the relevant statute—28 U.S.C. § 1915—“does not authorize the federal courts to make 25 coercive appointments of counsel”
• holding that 22 the relevant statute—28 U.S.C. § 1915—“does not authorize the federal courts to make 23 coercive appointments of counsel”
• holding that the relevant 18 statute—28 U.S.C. § 1915—“does not authorize the federal courts to make coercive 19 appointments of counsel”
• holding that § 1915 “does not authorize the federal courts to make coercive 19 appointments of counsel”
• holding that the relevant statute—28 U.S.C. § 1915—“does not 22 authorize the federal courts to make coercive appointments of counsel”
• holding that 28 U.S.C. § 1915 does not require compulsory appointment of counsel upon request

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).