Matter of Jepson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing where the appellant’s “statements about ‘getting things fixed’ in Washington, D.C.” were “ambiguous and susceptible to many interpretations”
• “Past verbal acts, while probative, must be supported by evidence that they clearly form a foundation for predicting future dangerousness.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).