Matter of Jefferson C.-A. (Carlos T.-F.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Secretary's position at the administrative level in promulgating and applying a regulation was substantially justified
• holding that Secretary’s position at the administrative level in promulgating and applying a regulation was substantially justified
• holding that Secretary’s position at the administrative level in promulgating and applying a regulation was substantially justified
• noting the “ambiguity of the disability ratings regulations” relating to extraschedular and TDIU considerations and the “need to streamline and clarify” these regulations
• “As to VA’s application of the revised regulation in the instant case, the Court cannot find that the Secretary’s position at the administrative level was not substantially justified because ‘the Board clearly relied upon then-current law.’” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).