Matter of J. (Sarajoy V.--Ryan G.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that district court dismissal 20 of 25 U.S.C. § 1303 petition was proper where appellants were not detained
• concluding no access to facilities, including inability of children to attend school, did not rise to a severe restraint on liberty
• refusing to consider the plaintiffs' claims for exclusion and eviction from the reservation because the plaintiffs had not exhausted their tribal remedies
• refusing to consider the plaintiffs’ claims for exclusion and eviction from the reservation because the plaintiffs had not exhausted their tribal remedies
• “[A] threat of confinement is not severe nor immediate enough to justify the writ.”
• “[A]ll federal courts addressing the issue mandate that two prerequisites be satisfied before they will hear a habeas petition filed under the ICRA: The petitioner must be in custody, and the petitioner must first exhaust tribal remedies.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).