Skip to main content
· 4/4/1995

MATTER OF HOSLEY v. Curry

Citations

  • 649 N.E.2d 1176
  • 85 N.Y.2d 447
  • 626 N.Y.S.2d 32
  • 1995 N.Y. LEXIS 693

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the terms \resident\ and \inhabitant\ are \properly understood to be synonymous with domicile\
  • stating that the terms “resident” and “inhabitant” are “properly understood to be synonymous with.domicile”
  • \resident\ in Public Officers Law § 3 (1) is properly understood to be synonymous with \domicile\
  • “For a change to a new domicile to be effected, there must be a union of residence in fact and an absolute and fixed intention to abandon the former and make the new locality a fixed and permanent home.” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kaye and Judges Simons, Titone, Bellacosa and Ciparick Concur With Judge Levine Judge Smith Dissents and Votes to Affirm for Reasons Stated in the Opinion by Justice Karen K. Peters at the Appellate Division (207 Ad2d 116)

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.