Matter of Harrell v. Fox

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming summary judgment for defendant, finding that the patent design of a body- washing brush and the accused product are “plainly dissimilar”
• listing six differences between the patented design and the accused design of body-washing brushes

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).