Matter of Harari v. Banash

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[I]t appears the drafters at our 1857 constitutional convention intended to deprive the legislature of the power to define infamous crimes.”
• “[I]t appears the drafters at our 1857 constitutional convention intended to deprive the legislature of the power to define infamous crimes.”
• “If the drafters intended the two concepts to be coextensive, different words would not have been used.”
• “If the drafters intended the two concepts to be coextensive, different words would not have been used.”
• “If the drafters intended the two concepts to be coextensive, different words would not have been used.”
• “In the end, it is for the courts to interpret the constitution.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).