Matter of H----S----, Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the word A must, @ as used in section 53.04, denotes mandatory statutory requirements
• holding that the word “must,” as used in section 53.04, denotes mandatory statutory requirements
• concluding petition and hearings did not afford appellant due process and fair treatment because petition did \not meet the mandatory requirements of the statute\
• concluding pétition and hearings did not afford appellant due process and fair treatment because petition did “not meet the mandatory requirements of the statute”
• holding that the word “must,” as used in section 53.04, denotes mandatory statutory requirements

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).