Skip to main content
· 6/19/1985

Matter of Guardianship of Stewart

Citations

  • 369 N.W.2d 820
  • 1985 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 1071

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting “a parent who has taken an extended holiday from the responsibilities of parenthood may not take advantage of the parental preference”
  • noting the father “did not relinquish his presumptive right to custody when he agreed that the [guardians] should be appointed as guardians for” the child
  • noting order was “more akin to an agreed order for temporary custody entered during the pendency of dissolution proceedings,” which would be “superceded by the more permanent dissolution decree”
  • noting the district court properly placed the burden of proof on the guardians to rebut the parental presumption by showing it is in the child’s best interests the guardianship continue
  • requiring return of child to natural father where father had kept in close contact, provided regular financial support, and frequently visited during the eight years child had lived with guardians
  • noting the best interests must be considered in all custody matters

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Reynoldson, McCormick, Schultz, Carter, Wolle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.