Matter of GP Express Airlines, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the “relating to” clause applied only to “penalty provision” because “[b]y definition, there is no interest accrual on a nonmonetary obligation.”
• holding that the “relating to” clause applied only to “penalty provision” because “[b]y definition, there is no interest accrual on a nonmonetary obligation.”
• holding that the “relating to” clause applied only to “penalty provision” because “[b]y definition, there is no interest accrual on a nonmonetary obligation.”
• holding that the “relating to” clause applied only to “penalty provision” because “[b]y definition, there is no interest accrual on a nonmonetary obligation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).